This is justice, and it should spread across the U.S. now that this decision has hit the table. There are a couple of other cases in waiting, so this is not the end, but this is a sign of our future - “parents are responsible for their kids”, not schools and fake ideology about gender.
The woke are responsible for the mass school shootings by Trans individuals they supported along the path to transitioning. The feedback provided to these kids was false and led them, without fully developed brains, down the path of no return. How many would be alive today if not for the deranged educators who think they own your kid? We trusted our kids to these educators who withheld information from the parents, preventing any intervention until it was too late. Lock up all these woke individuals, including the doctors who deliberately forced woke ideology on kids. All IMO.
https://www.nysun.com/article/parents-rights-in-childrearing-advance-in-california
“The right of parents to raise as they deem fit their children is being bolstered by the Supreme Court’s ruling against California in a case involving transgender public school students. The Golden State, seemingly in thrall to the militant ideology of transgender activists, had sought to bar schools from notifying parents if their children, say, “engage in gender transitioning at school,” the high court said. In a preliminary ruling the Nine is halting such policies — for now.
The parents’ grievances in Mirabelli v. Bonta put a spotlight on how transgender activism has taken root within certain precincts of the public education establishment. Two of the parents in the case, the Nine said, “were not told by their daughter’s school when she began to present as a boy and use a male name and male pronouns during her seventh-grade year.” Nor were these developments disclosed during “parent-teacher meetings,” the ruling said.
Two other parents reported that, starting in fifth grade, “their daughter has sometimes identified as a boy,” the ruling said. When the child was in seventh grade, the parents “confronted the school principal about their daughter’s transitioning” because “they believed the school was using a male name and pronouns for their daughter behind their backs.” What kind of justification could educators have for this kind of dissimulation toward parents?
California’s attorney general, Rob Bonta, frets that “the consequences of compelling the disclosure of confidential information about their gender identity would be irreversible.” This argument cut no ice with a majority on the high court, which held that the Coast’s policies of keeping parents in the dark “substantially interfere with” what the justices call the “right of parents to guide the religious development of their children.”