Trump needs to pressure China and tell Xi to his face that he is responsible for American deaths from supplying intelligence and weapons.
We cannot let China walk as they normally do because they are disgusting- the government and the CCP, that is. There are more than rumors going on about people going missing for organ harvesting, and it is repeatedly showing up in posts, highlighting a trend that might be true.
No more Mr. Nice Guy, Mr. President, because we cannot trust Xi, Putin or Kim Jung Un, the trio of socialists, communists and dictators all rolled into one. All IMO.
http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/op-eds/4725317/trump-china-leverage-iran-oil-summit/
“Beijing has already answered in public. At the BRICS summit in New Delhi on Saturday, Xi told the room that the Middle East war “does not serve the common interests of the international community.” The declaration the bloc adopted that day passed unanimously; Iran’s president was in the room, and so was Saudi Arabia’s foreign minister, and neither objected. It went further than sentiment: it criticized unilateral tariff and non-tariff measures as inconsistent with WTO rules, and denounced unilateral economic and secondary sanctions. Secondary sanctions are precisely the mechanism the Graham bill would use. On Sept. 12, twelve days before he was due in Washington, Xi helped put the objection on paper with eleven governments behind it.
There is also a record on the narrower question of weapons, and it is not reassuring. Days after their May summit in Beijing, President Donald Trump said Xi had promised that China was not sending arms to Iran: “That’s a beautiful promise. I take him at his word.” On July 24, he went further, writing that Xi had told him he would not “under any circumstances” give or sell weapons to Iran — “And that statement included Chinese Companies.” Five days later, Reuters reported a signed deal worth $60 million to $70 million for up to 400 Chinese-made shoulder-fired missile systems bound for Iran, arranged through a Hong Kong intermediary. Beijing called the report groundless; no delivery has been publicly confirmed, and Reuters’ own sources cautioned that schedules could change. Asked about it, Trump did not dispute the substance. That would be surprising, he said; Xi had told him very strongly he wouldn’t take part, “but he knows I’d be quite disappointed.”
Tehran, for its part, is arguing about Beijing in public. After Xi gave Iran’s president a few minutes on the sidelines in Bishkek on Sept. 1, Hossein Marashi, who heads a reformist party, claimed Beijing had set Tehran four conditions: Reopen Hormuz, stop charging ships, settle with Saudi Arabia, and settle with Washington. The office of parliament speaker Mohammad Bagher Ghalibaf, Tehran’s special envoy for China, denied it. The same week, according to the Iranian sources Reuters quoted, Tehran told the Houthis to strike Saudi Arabia — the opposite of Marashi’s third condition. Whatever Beijing is asking for, it is not obviously getting it.
Strip the map back, and one buyer sits underneath nearly all of it. Cut Beijing out — or price its participation high enough — and Tehran’s revenue thins, the proxies it funds thin with it, and Moscow’s largest customer acquires a reason to hesitate. That is the argument for treating Sept. 24 as the hinge rather than a trade meeting with an Iran file attached.”