Weaponization is the keyword, and that is what the leaks were used for: to bring down a Republican with a so-called intel release, but the only problem is that it was a lie.
The left, I’m sure, has its own examples of weaponization from the GOP, but there is a big difference that no one on the left, including our media, wants to discuss. The hate from the left for Trump is a disease in advanced stages. They have weaponized everything under the sun, and the media protects them or joins in on trying to take out Trump. Congress was weaponized under Biden to ram through unwanted policies, then came the legal lawsuits against Trump by corrupt Judges in NY as well as a prosecutor in Georgia joining the game. Appeals Courts are weaponized, as well as many Judges sitting on the Federal Bench. The IRS and FBI were weaponized during Obama’s and Biden’s days, and Eric Holder weaponized gerrymandering based on race. The schools of our kids are weaponized, teaching kids that the parents don’t own them, the schools do. So much more, but too much to cover here.
Now, for the kicker, and that is the accusation that Trump is weaponizing our government, but that is a lie and spin on the truth. It is not weaponization to remove illegals from our country; it is not weaponization to secure our borders. And it is not weaponization for the FBI to go after crimes committed by the left, you know, like billions of dollars in fraud stolen from the American people. These are true crimes, not a game of politics as the left does.
The only reason people don’t know the truth is that our media is weaponizing news by flooding fake stories and providing misinformation about Trump. And it is intentional ans we will all find out one day in the future. All IMO.
https://justthenews.com/government/security/fbi-probing-senate-intel-democrats-possible-classified-leaks-spurred-nsa
“The NSA made the referral last summer concerning reports, including one in TheNew York Times, earlier that year during Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard’s confirmation process that quoted information from an intercept of two Hezbollah terrorist figures who claimed Gabbard, during a 2017 trip to Syria, had met with the “big guy.”
The Times suggested the reference was taken by some to mean Gabbard had met with a top Hezbollah terrorist leader, a claim she adamantly denied.
NSA concluded the leak accurately contained information from one of its intercepts but that Gabbard had not in fact met with Hezbollah leaders.
The spy agency identified potential leakers among Senate Intelligence Committee Democrat staff who had access to the intercept prior to the Times report, sources said.
...
Since then, FBI counterintelligence and criminal agents have ramped up their probe and expanded to other potential leaks and media contacts tied to the committee’s Democrats, sources said.”