Of course they are biased, and it shows every day. They use anonymous sources to hide their bias and are repeatedly called out for errors. Of course, it is corrected, but always after the fact, when it has minimal impact, and the Times knows it and uses it as a strategy to get views and destroy Trump along the way.
The major news media agencies need to all be reviewed because many are reporting propaganda at worst, or leftist ideology at least. People don’t even know they are being programmed left, and those in media push the narrative and know it. It’s called brainwashing by the drip method, a drop at a time until you believe.
People need to stop taking everything hook, line and sinker from me or any news-promoting organization. There are a lot of me’s out there, single people working to get the word out, to keep people informed and to point out the lies of the progressives, now becoming the DSA. All IMO.
https://www.nysun.com/article/is-journalistic-bias-unconstitutional
“A lawsuit filed Wednesday against the Times seeks what Reuters calls “materials to determine whether the company’s board is letting the newspaper promote biased editorial coverage against Israel.” This brainstorm comes from a state-run pension fund in Florida and a conservative think tank. Their filing in a New York court reckons that, per Reuters, a “series of factual errors” supports a “reasonable inference” that it has “weaponized” its standards.
“When you’re a news agency, your credibility is everything,” says Florida’s attorney general, James Uthmeier, who filed the suit, at a press conference Wednesday. The Times, he added, “tells its own investors that its brand and reputation are its most important assets.” Yet the lawsuit avers that the subpar journalistic practices prevailing today at the Times are designed “to serve the personal agendas of unchecked editors.”
To that point, Florida’s lawsuit is seeking evidence to illuminate what it calls “a narrow question of corporate governance.” That, per the lawsuit, is “whether the Board exercises any meaningful oversight of the Company’s compliance with its own published editorial standards, source-verification protocols, corrections controls, and other internal controls on which the Company’s self-described principal asset depends.”
A spokesman for the Times responds that the suit, filed in state supreme court at Manhattan, “has no merit and was brought for an improper purpose.” He added that while the suit “is positioned as a corporate governance petition to inspect the company’s books and records,” the legal effort is meant “to exert agenda-driven pressure against an independent media organization, level false allegations of bias and chill journalism protected by the First Amendment.”