This article is a great read, and I am sure the feminists who read this are in an uproar. Why? Because it compares mothers versus fathers who killed their children and claimed insanity as the reason. As expected, men went to jail, and women went to mental institutions, where they could live freely in a minimal incarceration environment.
Women, or at least their lawyers, frame the crime, event or whatever you want to call it using women’s violence as a product of victimhood, coercion, medication effects, or mental illness. And they get away with it, almost like the recent case of Lindsey Clancy. Men, on the other hand, go directly to jail.
Feminists have degraded women to the point they can’t define one. Now think about that statement: they can’t define who they are, at least biologically, the easiest test there is. Things are slowly turning, but not fast enough for me. It is time for the real women to stand up and take back their identity, stolen by the nutjobs with mental issues.
This piece is a good read, and I suggest you take the time to read it. All IMO.
https://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2026/09/is-it-time-to-rip-the-insanity-fig-leaf-from-eve/
“To consider the Lindsey Clancy murder trial case: Maybe if Adam had slapped the apple out of Eve’s hand, the world wouldn’t be in the pickle it’s in. The story holds that in the Garden of Eden, Eve opened the door to death when she ate the forbidden fruit, yet when God demanded an explanation, he addressed the man, not the woman.
Throughout history, the consequences of similar actions seem to have been greater for men than for women.
Penalties for both, yes. But greater culpability for the man, also yes.
Women like to pretend they are autonomous beings who exercise the right to choose with impunity. Yet, when women kill children outside the sterile environment of a clinic, they blame their actions on diminished agency, mental illness, victimization, and physical helplessness.
For women, abortion = autonomy, murder = mental incapacity. ...
In popular culture, when a woman kills her children, the strong-woman narrative shifts to: “Oh my God, what happened to her?” “Is she mentally ill?” “Was she abused or controlled by a man?” “Did the medical/pharmaceutical complex damage her?”
On the one hand, pro-choice culture excuses women for disposing of generations of offspring as rational; but then that same culture makes excuses if she murders her babies after they’re born. But if a man kills his child, just as in the Garden, he’s held to a different standard and portrayed as dangerous, testosterone-driven, evil, and aggressive. Same atrocity, different defense.
Men are afforded no wiggle room, sympathy, or blame-shifting. It’s odd that, in a feminized ethos that emphasizes women’s sound mental capacity when it comes to ending billions of pregnancies worldwide over the past half-century, our culture seems more willing to quickly assign madness to a mother who then murders the children she let survive the womb, and to label as monstrous a man who has never chosen to abort a child but does the same.
Evidence supports this, so let’s review some facts. ...
Remember Andrea Yates and Timothy Jones Jr.? Each killed five of their children. At trial, both relied heavily on insanity defenses supported by evidence of psychosis. In the end, free-agent Yates received a verdict of not guilty by reason of insanity. If Yates had offed her children one by one in an abortion clinic, she’d be awarded a self-ruling medal of honor by Planned Parenthood, but for submitting her five children to an afterbirth abortion, she’s deemed insane and gets to live in a low-security psychiatric facility, doing arts and crafts, reading, sewing, and participating in therapeutic activities.
Meanwhile, Jones, who has no say in whether his children are aborted, presented substantial evidence of psychosis and expert testimony that he was legally insane. His insanity defense was rejected. When his time comes, South Carolina law will allow him to choose between lethal injection and the firing squad; otherwise, electrocution is the default.
Both are certifiable: one walks around in street clothes, while the other is a dead man walking.
Let’s move on. ...
It seems the justice system—and perhaps the female excuse-making philosophy surrounding it—is more inclined to interpret a woman’s violence as stemming from mental illness, in ways that diminish responsibility or reinforce victimhood, than to interpret a man’s violence similarly. How does that tendency further reinforce the strength of girl power that’s been beating us over the head ad nauseam for almost half a century?
Not only that, but women whom courts tend to think are, by nature, incapable of violence or hatred are responsible for ending billions of pregnancies worldwide over the past half-century. And the demographic effect doesn’t necessarily end there: many of those never-born children would eventually have had children and grandchildren of their own. The full generational impact of those decisions is impossible to calculate, but the number of lives that never entered subsequent generations, thanks to women exercising their supposed cogent right to choose, would likely far exceed the original number of abortions.
So much for the delusional belief that females are the kinder, gentler sex.
...”