This is batpoop crazy and censorship in the third degree, and this is exactly what the progressives would do if they take power. They almost did get away with it under Joe Biden and the forced censorship of information from Big Tech and our Mainstream Media. Remember, Joe wanted a board of progressives to determine what could be published or stated in public or online. Thankfully, that failed.
England has taken 10 steps back because of the fear of the massive Muslim population as a result of open borders. The culture has changed to who-knows-what, but it is not the culture of the past, and that is sad. Europe is in deep trouble and still can’t see beyond its nose. Why is an opinion against LGBTQ hate speech? Why isn’t an opinion against religion hate speech? But then Europe seems to be out of touch for now. All IMO.
“The point is that today, in a liberal democracy, a Christian cannot publicly state or defend fundamental Christian moral teaching about homosexuality—a teaching that is held to some degree by Orthodox Jews and Muslims as well—without breaking the law. The right not to be insulted if you are a member of a protected class stands to hurt gays and lesbians too. Under Finland’s hate-speech law, a gender-critical lesbian feminist who writes a pamphlet saying male-to-female transgenders are not really women and shouldn’t have the right to be in female-only spaces could find herself in the dock.
For many years, gay-rights activists and allies have denied that the triumph of their cause would come at the expense of religious faith. It was never true, though as a political matter it was strategically clever to pretend it was. “How does my neighbors’ gay marriage affect me?” was thought to be the killer line to discredit claims by Christians and others that accepting same-sex marriage would have broad social effects, including potentially curtailing religious freedom.”