So, these organizations lie and manipulate news to be contrary to anything Trump does and when it comes to National Security leaks or misreporting news that could help our enemies.
How can this Judge do something so crazy? What if these orgs go back and go full out with false or unconfirmed information that could destroy this meeting? A meeting of critical nature and national defense, along with SuperIntelligence. The media is already in on no data centers and will probably be rewarded by the CCP for support. Talking CCP heads rings a bell.
I no longer have faith in our Judicial system bending and even ignoring laws and our Constitution. There is no free speech when it comes to any National Defense information, and all you have to do is ask any military person. Those who did are in jail, removed from the military or both.
SCOTUS is no better with the weird decision on allowing unlimited to eternity birthright citizenship; what a joke decision, with Amy and Roberts switching sides. I can’t figure this one out. Trump has the media, Judges, SCOTUS and other roadblocks every day, and yet he continues to win. All IMO.
“Reporting on the planned military bunker beneath the new East Wing complex and an article about the Defense Department’s munitions shortage are among the stories the Trump administration used to justify banning three media outlets from the White House.
The White House last week revoked the credentials of nearly 80 journalists from Politico, CNN and MS Now after President Trump called their reporting “fake news” and later deemed their coverage a threat to national security.
The administration’s press office sent letters Tuesday to the three outlets, listing their offenses and giving them until Friday to respond.
Mr. Trump’s press team listed news stories containing “sensitive security information,” among them an August 2026 CNN story that cited unnamed sources who reported the U.S. had exhausted most of its interceptors for a critical missile defense system.
The letters to the three outlets cited numerous stories about national security issues that cited anonymous sources.
Their coverage, White House press office officials said, “diverts White House resources and those of the national security team in particular, which must evaluate whether the leaked information is classified, the source of any leak, and the security implications of any such disclosure.”